Author’s Note: The following article was sent, as a “letter to the editor” to the Times Journal two weeks in a row, most recently with an appeal “please publish this week,” to no avail. No doubt Schoharie County needs other outlets….the Times Journal just can not be trusted to fulfill its responsibilities to our democracy.
*****************************************************************
State Police enforcement policy has been in the news lately. The July 2nd edition of the Times Journal reported that the Am-Jam organizers were threatening to leave Cobleskill because of the State Police harassment. The following week the paper included an editorial addressing the same issue.
The Am-Jam folks are justifiably angered by the State Police road blocks their participants are subjected to every year. There’s little doubt some potential attendees are deterred, and the experience of those who do attend is significantly degraded, by the police harassment. In point of fact, the quality of life of all Schoharie County Citizens is negatively impacted by the State Police road blocks. Motorists of all descriptions are inconvenienced and annoyed.
When evaluating a public policy, such as law enforcement pressure, we would be well advised to consider all potential visitors as part of our community. We should not subject visitors to a level of law enforcement pressure we would not tolerate ourselves. I am in agreement with the Times Journal editorial which closed saying we should make visitors feel welcome, however, other editorial comments I find seriously misguided. The editorial stated: “We understand [the Am-Jam organizers] frustration, but she shouldn’t expect State Police to back off.” and “…Cobleskill Village officials aren’t about to ask State Police to lay off, which amounts to asking Troopers to not do their job. This is unthinkable.”
I disagree, it is entirely “thinkable,” indeed it is our responsibility to comment on and influence law enforcement activities. And, our elected representatives, from the village level on up, are the proper conduit for citizens’ input. We certainly can expect law enforcement to “back off” when an offensive policy is more than the citizens are willing to endure, or, if the policy is not supported in law.
State Police Major Spregue was quoted in the July 2nd story referring to “…the State Police…motorcycle safety check program.” If the State Police have developed such a statewide motorcycle safety check program and applied it more stringently this year due to a sharp increase in motorcycle fatalities as reported in the news story, they should be able to provide documentation of the policy and statistics relevant to the reasons for and the effectiveness of the program. Major Sprague is also quoted as saying “Any event that draws Hell’s Angels is going to be the focus of the State Police.” This statement is all the justification needed for citizens to carefully examine the Trooper’s behavior relevant to Am-Jam.
The State Police like to use the “Safety Check” rubric so as to allow them to throw the largest net possible, with the least manpower, while avoiding charges of unconstitutional intrusion upon citizen’s movement and privacy. It is obvious that the application of this “safety check program” to Am-Jam attendees targets motorcyclists. Factor in the Major’s comment about Hell’s Angels and the law enforcement purpose of this “safety check” policy becomes very clear: That is the unconstitutional stop and search of certain motorists because of their assumed association with other citizens the police believe might be engaged in criminal activity. If I am correct in my assessment, Major Sprague, Troop G, the State Police and the State of New York need to re-examine their motorcycle safety check policy, their Hell’s Angels harassment policy, and revisit their relevant training efforts. Doing so might mitigate monetary awards resulting from litigation.
Citizens should not hesitate to question executive power and law enforcement policies. In a society ordered by the application of law it is sometimes the case that official enforcers become the law violators. It is every citizen’s duty to be alert to that possibility and to speak out for correction of the problem.
To help Times Journal readers to more fully understand what is at play with this issue I must ask: How would the Agricultural Society and Schoharie County citizens respond if the State Police set up a vehicle safety check on South Grand St. during the Sunshine Fair? How would the college, the students and their parents react if the Troopers decided to do their checkpoint in front of the college during student-parent visitation week?
Wayne Stinson for Rabble Rouser
Filed under: Homeland Insecurity, Police State Update
